Archive for the Financial Literacy Category

Mortgage Income Tax Deduction is JUST a Subsidy to Banks

Posted in Financial Literacy, Just the Facts, Uncategorized with tags , , , , on August 22, 2011 by marcitz

For years there has been a religious like devotion to the Mortgage Income Tax Deduction (MITD) and its benefit for the home buyer.  In stark economic truth it is actually bad for home buyers (twice) and great for banks.  This is further proof of how stacked the economy is in favor of the banks.  So the banks exploitation of society hasn’t been going on for 10 years, its been going on for over 60.  Here is the mathematical and social proof.

  • The MITD applies to interest only.
  • It allows a home buyer to pay more in monthly interest payments because they will get some of that back as part of MITD.
  • So consumers are willing to pay more interest which means they are willing to pay more for a house (because they can support a larger loan principle).
  • The interest goes to the bank who profits by the uptick in interest payments.
  • The buyer pays more for a house.
  • The taxpayer (who is also the home buyer) pays for that payment to the bank out of their own taxes (cause tax dollars are diverted to the MITD)

Its that simple and we’ve been falling for it since the end of World War II.

Here are some numbers:

  • Let’s say (without the MITD) the you have $2000 to spend on a mortgage per month you’ll buy a certain amount of house.
  • If you add the MITD you can now buy about $2500 of house (assuming you have 20% tax rate, not realisitic but makes the math simple for this exercise).
  • Your spend $2500 and you get $500 back with the MITD.  So what happens is a person is now willing to spend 25% more on the same house because they can afford 25% more in monthly INTEREST payments.  Since houses are basically bidding processes enough people compete such that the price goes up to absorb the entire deduction.
  • At the end of the day the person is no better off and actually is worse off because they scrape to find the extra $500 per month and then get relief at tax time with a big check the makes them whole (losing any interest they could have earned on that $500 in the interim and possibly incurring financing charges because they needed to get that $500 cash flow somehow in the interim, lets say through credit card debt.)
  • In the meantime the bank collected that $500 extra a month and they didn’t need to give it back. That came from the government (AKA the taxpayer).
  • Hence the buyer gets to pay more for a house and more for his taxes overall.

So next time you brag about your mortgage income tax deduction remember you just helped make a bank wealthier at your own personal expense (both as a buyer of house who paid more than you needed to and as a taxpayer who financed it).

Learn to Fish Or You’re Fucked

Posted in Financial Literacy, Just the Facts with tags , , , , , on November 5, 2009 by marcitz
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. 
                                                                                                                                                   – Chinese Proverb

In dealing with the housing crisis or even the larger economic crisis two things have been happening.  The government has been throwing money at the problem and now they are throwing regulations at the problem.  Let me first start off by saying that this is not a post about whether either of those is right or wrong (both are probably right to some degree).   This is about the fact that that won’t actually protect people from the next big bubble in which everyone, blinded by greed and ignorance, will get suckered again.    That’s because the next bubble is all about something that isn’t covered by regulation.  It won’t be housing, it will be something else (my bet is on “green” stocks in about 2017 or Gold 9 months from next Tuesday).  In short the government is giving everyone a fish in terms of regulation, they are not teaching us how to fish in the form of education.

Don’t believe me?  Well lets see how well governments have prevented bubbles from reoccurring in the past.   To do that check out these stories and articles:

Well those books go so far back that maybe they were just stupid in the dark ages.  Fine lets go more recently to America where we have brilliant financial minds, computers and Jimmy Dean Sausage-on-a-Stick.

So three bubbles and three new sets of regulations and someone still found another bubble that wasn’t covered by the previous regulations (as they have been doing for 800 years, long before computers or Jimmy Dean).  One can argue that the regulations at least prevented the bubble happening in the same area but alas another bubble still happened.

What this means is that the government really should be teaching the American public HOW TO FISH or at least how to smell something that’s fishy because in the end there will be another bubble, followed by another set of regulations, followed by another bubble.  Regulations always arrive to late so you, the indivdual, have to survive on your wits for a bit.

Up until now, however, have you heard anyone in Congress talk about introducing financial literacy into the schools? NO!   Are we worried people won’t be interested?  Au contraire mon frere as you can check out the most popular class at Wellesley which teaches the basics of personal finance.

Is the government producing and distributing basic facts on making large financial decisions to the public? NO!   Maybe they just don’t want to draw attention to how many kids graduate public school and can’t read.

So in short if you don’t get yourself educated you are completely screwed when the next bubble comes along.  If you don’t believe me remember I’ve got 800 years of history, 2 Harvard economics professors (one a Nobel prize nominee), the former chief economist for Bear Stearns (she got out long before “that” happened), and a 24 pack of Jimmy Dean Sausage-on-a-Stick on my side.

And to make sure I end on a depressing note I’m not even sure regulation can prevent the same type of bubble from happening again.  In 1997 the FDIC published a study called “History of the Eighties – Lessons for the Future” in which you can find this little gem: 

Third, the banking problems of the 80s and 90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending.  It is instructive to note that the real estate boom and lending fiasco appears to have started in the United States.

…Excess real estate lending, powered by rapidly rising rents and prices, rapidly occured worldwide.  But more than anything else, real esate lending became the fashion, the ‘new’ banking idea of the times.

So PLEASE President Obama, take us to the nearest lake or stream and show us how to cast an economic line as we shouldn’t be the ones taking the bait.  Sure spend some time on regulation but more (or at least some) time on EDUCATION.   The best I can do in the short term is send you to an excellent site called the Khan Academy (look under the “Finance” or “Credit Crisis“ section) which has some great educational videos.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.